What is being said about the Trust Summit, and whether it is holding.
A monitoring and evidence desk for the Summit’s follow-through.
47
items of coverage collected and classified
23%
of keyword matches were never about this Summit
3
findings that shape the Desk, inside
Think Delus · October 2026 · Prepared for The Trust Summit Secretariat
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus1 / 13
Agenda
What this deck covers
01
What is being said about the Trust Summit, and whether it is holding
03
What Nairobi created
04
A two-year obligation, and no instrument to see it
05
So we ran it on your Summit
06
A quarter of the noise was never about you
07
The loudest voice was the convenors’ own
08
Only three voices pressed delivery
09
The desk, one cycle
10
Classification before counting
11
Ten weeks, with the exit stated
12
What the pilot costs
THE SHAPE OF IT
One demonstration, 47 items. Three findings. One ten-week pilot to approve.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus2 / 13
The Nairobi Declaration
What Nairobi created
Paragraph 22
A Coalition on Global Trust
A standing coalition to carry the Declaration’s commitments beyond the room in which they were made.
Paragraph 23
A Nairobi Trust Council
Hosted by Kenya, to follow up and review progress on the commitments themselves.
Paragraph 24
A Global Trust Facility
Championed for establishment by the UN and administered by UNDP, financing trust infrastructure over four years.
Paragraph 25
A Framework for Action
To be developed by the Secretariat, with a mechanism for monitoring, tracking and reporting on progress.
Oct 2026
Declaration adopted
2026 to 2028
Follow-through, in public
2028
First biennial account
The Declaration named instruments with defined work. Instruments need evidence.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus3 / 13
The gap
A two-year obligation, and no instrument to see it
“What is being said about the Summit, by whom, and is it holding?”
Citizens
Trust between people
↔
Institutions
Trust between citizens and the bodies that serve them
↔
Global order
Trust between states and multilateral bodies
The obligation
Paragraph 25 gives the Secretariat a monitoring, tracking and reporting duty. Paragraph 28 sets the next Summit two years out.
The deadline
The first biennial account will be written from whatever record exists at the time. Records cannot be built retrospectively.
The position today
There is no maintained, evidenced record of the public account of the Summit and its commitments. What exists today is clippings.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus4 / 13
The demonstration
So we ran it on your Summit
47
items of public coverage collected, 18 to 23 October 2026
3
days of the Summit itself, 21 to 23 October
6
source classes: news, broadcast, official and social among them
1
written classification rubric, applied to all 47 items
31 SIGNAL
11 NON-SIGNAL
5 ADJ
Signal, concerned the SummitNon-signal, false positives and name collisionsAdjacent
Each item was classified for relevance, frame and tone, and logged in a corpus file with its source, so any figure in this deck can be traced to the item it came from. The largest single source was KBC, with 4 signal items across web, YouTube and Facebook. What follows are the three results that matter.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus5 / 13
Finding one
A quarter of the noise was never about you
of keyword-matched content was not about this Summit at all
Name collisions: other documents called a Nairobi Declaration4
Non-signal in total11
Concerned the Summit (31 signal, 5 adjacent)36
A keyword monitor reports all 47 as your coverage. It overstates the Summit’s presence by roughly a quarter, and the error is invisible from inside the report.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus6 / 13
Finding two
The loudest voice was the convenors’ own
of signal coverage came from the convenors’ own machinery
Signal items in total31
First-party, partner or amplification channels13
Independent coverage18
Judged by origin, the Summit’s own properties, government channels, partner organisations and amplification pages supplied the largest single share of its coverage.
Volume overstates support. Judged by origin, independent scrutiny is 18 items, and that is the number a reporting obligation has to answer to.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus7 / 13
Finding three
Only three voices pressed delivery
Three items in the entire corpus asked what happens next. They came from the most credible voices in it.
The Eastleigh Voice, reporting the Summit
“calls out gaps in Kenya’s public accountability”
KICTANet
“trust is not a soft skill”
The delivery question
3 of 47
items pressed delivery. The Desk exists so the Secretariat hears those voices first, in context, with the source attached.
These are the lines that will be quoted back if delivery slips. A monitoring desk exists so that the Secretariat hears them first, in context, with the source attached.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus8 / 13
The product
The desk, one cycle
Sources, monitored daily
Web newsKenya and East Africa titles
Broadcast, on the webStation pages, streams and clips
Official channelsSummit, government and partner properties
Social sourcesWhere platform access is licensed
→
The Narrative Intelligence Desk
Each item read, de-duplicated and classified against a written rubric: relevance, frame and tone, with its source attached.
→
Products, on a fixed cycle
Daily alert digest, 07:30 EATRisks flagged, with the reason
Weekly brief, Monday 09:00 EATThree to five pages, classified by frame
Corpus fileAll items, sources and classifications
Monthly frame reviewTested against your reading
One subject: the Summit and its follow-through. Kenya and East Africa, Monday to Monday.
The Trust Summit SecretariatThink Delus9 / 13
The method
Classification before counting
☰
Classified by frame
Coverage is classified by the argument it makes, so a brief shows who is persuading and who is merely publishing.
✎
A written rubric
Relevance, frame and tone are assigned against a written classification rubric that your team may inspect.
✓✓
The two-person rule
Any item classed as critical or a reputational risk is checked by a second analyst before it reaches you.
⚑
A published audit
Each quarter, 20 items are re-classified blind and the agreement rate is printed.
Quarterly blind audit: 20 items re-classified, agreement rate published in the following briefFLOOR 85%
Below the 85 per cent floor, the rubric is revised and the revision is recorded. De-duplication and entity resolution happen before anything is counted. That is what removes the 23 per cent.